Transcendence of the modern constitution-No need to follow the modern nation / modern constitution by white people! ~

1. Constitution of the national constitution What is the constitution on which it depends? I run into the big proposition.
In other words, in Japan, it is a "constitution only if there is a nationality", and it is absolutely essential to verify whether the nationality is maintained after the war and to implement it in order to eliminate the obstacles.
Poisoned by the view of the history of the defeat of the Greater East Asia War, he gladly accepted the occupation of foreign troops, crushed the so-called colonial system that had destroyed the self-sufficient food system, and revived Japan's world historical mission. It is extremely important to implement a part of the constitutional amendment on the premise of building a sovereign state.
Not to mention the eradication of constitutionalists who are looking at obedience to China and Korea, but on the contrary, it is undeniable that constitutional reformists who aim to hinder Japan's independence and promote colonies against the United States must also be abandoned. It is.
Furthermore, it must be emphasized that new values that surpass modern, Western, and Christian civilizations are absolutely indispensable in order to carry out the struggle for new civilization, which is Japan's world historical mission. It is nothing but.
Since it is recognized by the Western powers as a modern nation, it has been equipped with Western national components for 200 years.

The values that have made "Western constitution and parliamentary politics" a prerequisite for the existence of a nation are none other than the values that should be overthrown for a new civilization.
However, the constitutional debate by shelving these major propositions, which has been consistently held after the war, is trapped in the curse of the constitutional supreme principle of "the superiority of the constitution over the national people" regardless of the constitutional amendment. The nation as an organism, which is poisoned by the curse of "the constitution is not enough for the nation" and has inorganic articles and contract clauses, because it adheres to the modern national values poisoned by the West, modernity, and Christianity. The white enlightenment idea, which is pervaded by the restraint of the nation, relies on its roots.
The values of the end of the branches and leaves, where the nations and peoples are placed under the Constitution, are the only postwar values that should be separated.

2. What will change the constitution?
It is no exaggeration to say that the center of the debate nowadays is the mere aspect of the Constitution and forgets the actual aspect of the Constitution.
Therefore, an expert says.

First, "The current constitution is not created by Japan itself, but an imposed occupation constitution."

Second, "the current constitution is no longer suitable for the times." "There is no country other than Japan that has never revised the constitution since its enactment."

The first issue is quite natural, and violates the principle that "without free will, there can be no constitutional amendment" in customary international law.

It is unreasonable in that it intentionally ignores the violation of Article 43 of the Hague Convention, which prohibits the revision of the Constitution during the occupation, and it is considered that there is no legitimacy as an imposing constitution or a similar unconstitution.
However, it is not invalid, and its legal status is nothing more than the Temporary Occupation Basic Law at the time of enactment, and the Temporary Basic Law with the condition of cancellation of future voluntary disposal after the peace treaty comes into effect.
Therefore, the laziness of successive administrations, which have been neglected as a constitution and glued to the constitutional amendment to this day, should be blamed above all, and it is natural that a voluntary constitution must be enacted as soon as possible as an invocation of a free governing will. ..
On the other hand, the left-wing microcephaly syndrome, which states that "Japan was not involved in the postwar war because of Kujo," is not ridiculous to argue.
The fact that being occupied by foreign troops is proof that it is not an independent nation capable of war, and that US client states that cannot exercise sovereignty are seized by US powerful nuclear weapons and aggression-type troops. Are you aware of?
However, it must be considered as a problem that the commentary has been continued for more than 60 years, even if all the problems are solved by amending the Constitution.
It must be clearly recognized that a constitutional amendment that leaves the current colonial state untouched will lead to the acceptance of the colonial state.

In the second issue, it is quite natural to change the law based on the promotion of Japan's unique national strategy and world view, but it is very doubtful whether Japan really has its own national strategy and world view now. I cannot escape the feeling of emptiness.
Furthermore, it must be concluded that the comparison of other countries itself impairs the sublimeness and uniqueness of Japan.

3. The seller has no legal interpretation right!
The text of the Occupation Constitution, called the current Constitution, has endlessly performed interpretation battles that are convenient for oneself, as if deciphering ancient characters, and in particular, the ninth regarding abandonment of war, non-retention of force, and denial of the right to engage. Article interpretation and Article 20 interpretation of religion are typical examples!
In the first place, it is natural that the right to interpret the law is not a judge but a politician who is the chief operating officer of the legal order.
The Constitution and the law should be nothing more than normative assistance for the protection, development and growth of Japan's "national interests, national interests, and national history."
However, after the war, there was a mystery that the Constitution and the law had priority over "Kokutai, National Interest, and National History", and the dogmatic interpretation of the Constitutional Law became widespread.
Attorneys and prosecutors' individual abilities and judges' personal discretion will be used for different interpretations.
As shown in the district court, the high court, the Supreme Court's reversal judgment, and the conflict of interpretation rights between lawyers in TV programs, it can be said that individualism has been dismissed even in legal interpretation.
The harmful effects of individualism are just around the corner!

In the first place, the post-war democracy, which is spoken of by liberalism, pacifism, and individualism, is nothing but a enslavement policy toward Japan that seeks to destroy our national polity, and either abolished the Constitution or tampered with the civil law most familiar to the people. However, the fact that the Japanese community system has been deposed is a very serious situation.
Therefore, we must recognize that the politicians are the traitors who promote the self-destruction of our country in order to abolish the national corruption caused by such individualism!
And despite advocating individualism, in fact! The people should be even more astonished that there is no true personal freedom or benefit in our country, and that there is no freedom or benefit of the Japanese nation, which should be a culmination!
After the defeat of the Greater East Asia War, Japan has been consistently placed under the military administration of the Japan-US Security Treaty, and it is natural that it cannot be said to be a true independent sovereign state.
On the surface, it is independent, but when virtually all fields such as politics, economy, culture, and national defense are under the control of the United States, how can only the Constitution and the law take its own path?

4. Recognize our mission The constitution and law are under the control of the United States!
It is quite natural for the United States, which is trying to enslave Japan, to breed colonial norms in Japan, and the Constitution is a mere skeleton to maintain the physical condition of a modern nation!
Therefore, only those who are in line with the intentions of the United States have been placed in public positions and used as sentinels for the colonial constitution and legal norms. In the first place, it should be strongly recognized that there is no original constitution in the US colony consistently after the war!

With a mixture of left-wing constitutional sellers who make the US version of the constitution a monument, and old-fashioned sellers who try to sneak up on the United States even if the constitution is amended, we must realize once again that the true constitutional debate lies in the construction of a true independent sovereign state. Must!
For that reason, we must strongly recognize that no progress can be made in postwar Japan without raising the abolition of the US-Japan Security Treaty, which takes precedence over the Constitution!
"We will replace all values and legal orders poisoned by modern, Western, and Christian civilizations, and demand the enactment of general laws based on Japanese traditions and the prioritization of the platform over laws and regulations." The text in Article 15 of the One-Article Code is the basic idea of the legal order of our movement.
I am convinced that the Constitution of the Dainichi this empire, which enacted the modern constitution, which is one of the minimum requirements for a modern nation based on the part of the world modernization of white imperialism, was the best from the historical background at that time. In our movement to overthrow white imperialism, we believe that even a white-style constitution that must look at the complexion of white people should be abandoned, and if so, the world's oldest constitution, the "Seventeen-article Constitution of the Prince of Japan" Shouldn't we praise the continuation of (because it has not been abolished)!
And, the original customs that follow the traditional laws of Japan, such as the Taiho Code of 701 AD, which set the national name of Japan, the Goseibai Shikimoku of the Kamakura period, and the Buke Shohatto enacted in 1615 of the Edo period. A legal order based on the law must be established.
It is natural that Japan's national law, which restores the national constitution and strives for the world-historical mission of overthrowing white imperialism and struggling for new civilization, is a self-respect that does not need to be explained and understood by the West.
In 1409, after the Seventeen-Article Constitution of Prince Shotoku, the oldest constitution in the world, was promulgated in May of the 12th year of the Christian era (604 AD), the true constitution that is not imitating white monkeys is now enacted, and from the U.S. military administration We must be aware that we will openly carry out the escape (crushing Japan-US security)!