Nuclear power is a national defense issue
Deception of peaceful use!
Do not talk about nuclear issues without the will to maintain the independent development of nuclear weapons.

1. Abolition of commercial nuclear power plants and construction of national defense nuclear power plants First of all, the current nuclear power plant administration is extremely vulnerable from a national defense standpoint and is extremely dangerous.

All of them are lined up unprotected in the coastal area and are the first target from the enemy, and it is Keihin, Tokai, Hokuriku, that the radius of 30 km will not function like this time with the blow of the destruction of the nuclear power plant. There is a danger that the destruction of four nuclear power plants in the Kyushu region will completely silence Japan's national defense, economics, housing, electricity, and social functions.

Furthermore, for North Korean craftsmen, the nuclear power plants located on the coast of the Sea of Japan are exposed as a good target for intimidating occupation after landing.
In the first place, it is self-evident that if the facility itself is not domestically produced, it will cause major obstacles in terms of future development, operation and maintenance, but in this respect, there are many veiled parts in nuclear technology.

Naturally, there must be a lot of content that can be linked to nuclear weapons at one nuclear power plant, and the victorious nation naturally refuses to provide nuclear weapons in order to prevent Japan from refusing to possess nuclear weapons. It is the current situation.

If the nuclear power plant is in such a half-finished state, it is natural that such measures must be taken.

We must conclude that proclaiming a "safety declaration" to local residents regarding the installation of nuclear power plants is a betrayal.
In addition, since the best weapon of mass destruction at present is a nuclear weapon, this development research is naturally necessary from the viewpoint of Japan's greatness, and it is placed under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense from a national defense standpoint and dealt with confidentially and safely. What you do is not wait for words.
Therefore, all private commercial nuclear power plants that play with the current peaceful use and sophistry should be abolished, and research and development of independent national defense nuclear power plants should be carried out immediately.
And I am convinced that the self-defense system as an independent nation, the food self-sufficiency system, and the technological development of new weapons that surpass the world to replace nuclear weapons are nothing but the construction of Japan, a great nation based on the world historical mission. It is something to do.

2. Take revenge on the criminal who dropped the atomic bomb!

It must be understood that the nuclear issue is, in other words, the nuclear issue, which must be referred to and verified even with the nuclear weapons issue.
However, "nuclear weapons" and "nuclear weapons" are positioned as the highest taboos for Japan after the war, and even the "nuclear weapon possession debate" became a fuss that pierced the beehive once it was spoken, and I wanted to stop by. The party was set to "Murahachibu" and "a lid was put on the stinking thing" to settle the case.

"We must be aware of the unusual situation in which Japan has become an" eight grave village "after the war.
In the first place, "Japan will never go to war again!"

"We have no weapons!"

"Article 9 of the Constitution," which is a kind of new religion after the war with the slogan of "Article 9 of the Constitution," is predominant.

The paradise dragonflies who say that "permanent neutrality" can be achieved by screaming and praying for this Nembutsu, this time screaming "Don't repeat the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki!" And chanting "Three non-nuclear principles". It is a mystery that it will be a peaceful society without war.

The Liberal Democratic Party, which is said to be "conservative" only on the left wing, has also pushed forward with the idea of money worship with the shield of "Article 9 of the Law" and has shown a nuclear rejection reaction.
The distinction between postwar conservatism and innovation is only the difference between being a minion in the nuclear issue or being a puppet of the Soviet Union and China, and is based on "self-defense" and "liberation of Asia." He has continued to denounce those who claim to continue the Toa Holy War and those who insist on "building a re-armed and nuclear-armed nation" as denials of democracy.

After the war, Japan is now soaked in the historical view of the defeated nation that it is so defeated that it does not make people think that strange ethnic sentiments are ridiculous.

Not only the government, but also the left wing and civilian sailors "dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945," "the bombing of Tokyo, which burned over 300,000 innocent women and girls in 1945," and "600,000 immediately after the end of the war." In response to the "Siberian detention that abducted soldiers in the cold and killed 60,000 people," are they conducting protests seeking apology and compensation from the US government and the Russian government of the Soviet Union?

I'm totally in doubt!
Those who were shot dead by their relatives

"I won't murder! I won't use a gun!"

Where is the idiot who declares?

For example, if my daughter was killed

"I'll take the criminal with my hands!"

Is the real intention, and even if it is not, it is natural to strongly demand an apology and damages from the criminal.
When it comes to the nation, perhaps because he is a servant of the criminal, he can't complain about the murderer in front of him, and he just agrees.

At the end of the phrase

"My daughter was killed because your discipline was bad!"

It's like ranting a misguided rant.

Fear of Japan and Germany in the victorious nation = weak army, denuclearization It may be unavoidable that it was human psychology to be wrapped up in a long one. However, Japan has a long history of self-improvement and efforts to strengthen its national power in order to always insist on the truth to the world.
It has been 10 years since Japan, which won the Sino-Japanese War in 1895, aroused the regret of the so-called Triple Intervention, which had to abandon its interests by the three powers of Russia, Germany and France at that time. The fact that it later crushed the cunning and ill-fated enemy Russia is clearly stated in the history of just 100 years ago.
The prosperity of such a nation is first acquired through bloody efforts and patience, and conversely, in an instant by the relaxation and affection of bokeh peace, and the easy-going acts of cowardice. History eloquently tells us that it is inevitable that we will fall into corruption. If we take a look at history, it is hard to say that unarmed and weakly armed nations, which neglected the masterpiece of national existence, were always destined to be overrun by neighboring powers.
As an example, a permanent neutral country (permanent = fixed neutral country, not necessarily eternal = therefore, there can be no original permanent neutrality)

Switzerland will be the first to be raised, but in Switzerland it will not only be possible to mobilize about 400,000, and finally 1.5 million, within 48 hours for 3,400 professional military personnel. It must be remembered that it is a powerful armed nation based on conscription, capable of mobilizing 380,000 civil defense forces.
From ancient times, it is so famous in the world that the mercenaries of the Vatican City of Pope are Swiss soldiers because of their strong soldiers.

In fact, in World War II, the Swiss Air Force counterattacked the planes that invaded the territory of both the Allies and the Axis powers.

What kind of nation is a strong country? Regardless of the ruling and opposition parties, they are touting the same sound, but I can't understand it at all.

What do I mean by a powerful country without referring to a "nation that wins the war"? It should be pointed out here that winning a war is apt to fall into the short-circuit event of simply "increasing the number of military personnel, fighters, and tanks", but first and foremost, Japan The question is whether they can be self-reliant or capable as an independent nation.
"The nation guarantees all the lives of its own people, who can eat their own meals, have the will and ability to protect their homeland by themselves."
It is a matter of politics above all, and the establishment of a nationalist government by a worldview party led by a strong political leader is absolutely essential.

Therefore, it is necessary to wipe out the sellers who are struggling with all kinds of hostile acts, crush the weakening policy toward Japan poisoned by postwar values, and overthrow the "postwar economic, social, and judicial" system.
Second, about military power.

In order to carry out our world-historical mission, that is, to win the new struggle with white imperialism, whether we can possess the latest weapons of mass destruction, nuclear weapons, and powerless nuclear weapons. It depends on whether Japan can develop and possess as many overwhelming super weapons as possible.

Currently, the backbone of the world order is the monopoly control of nuclear weapons by the victorious nations of World War II = the Allies = the permanent members of the United Nations.
Of course, the act of decisively deterring the possession of nuclear weapons in Japan and Germany, which were and will continue to exist, is nothing more than blatant.
The inability to develop, manage and operate nuclear weapons means that the maintenance of nuclear power generation, which should be a part of it, is inadequate.

And even now, 67 years after the war, we must clearly question the current situation in which the strategy of not allowing Japan to possess nuclear weapons is a common sense in the world.

The NPT Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty also has the unique purpose of monopolizing nuclear weapons by the victorious nations = not allowing Japan and Germany to possess nuclear weapons, and has still maintained the control system immediately after World War II. ..
Therefore, even if India, Pakistan, and Israel possess nuclear weapons, it will make neighboring countries smell bad, but it is clear that it will not affect the maintenance of world domination of the Sengoku period, so it is big. It's not a topic.
However, what does it mean for Japan and Germany to have nuclear weapons?
It must be understood that there is a reality that cannot be done with a simple composition such as "Of course, the two great powers with the ability to possess nuclear weapons and the technological capabilities to develop nuclear weapons should have it"!
In other words, the current world order is still positioned as an extension of the victory or defeat of World War II, "By holding Japan and Germany to the permanent defeated nation = villain, the victorious nation = good role emerges." You have to be aware of that.
We must be strongly aware that "the maintenance and prosperity of the current world order is based on the sacrifice of Japan and Germany."

4. Nuclear development is premised on the development of voluntary new nuclear weapons!
It is necessary for Japan to publicly announce to the world that it has the will to possess nuclear weapons, and to put into practical use the civilian use of nuclear power from the viewpoint of Japan's defense, on the premise of developing, technology, and experimenting with it. There is.
Without doing so, how can we simply soak in the bokeh peace and redevelop it in a straightforward manner, exposing the total lack of control seen after the earthquake? In other words, it is inevitable that the defenseless nuclear power plants lined up in the coastal area will be the first target of the enemy, including North Korean missiles, for innocent economic convenience, and it should be possible to carry such things in the war. It should be self-evident that there is no such thing.

Dr. von Braun V2 rocket development In the United States after the war. The world would have changed if Germany had a nuclear weapon.

Therefore, there is an urgent need to remove all of these from the current area and abolish them, and to install and manage Japan's own nuclear research institutes and power plants under the jurisdiction of the new National Defense (Ministry of Defense) in strict defense facilities. Is quite natural.

In the first place, regarding nuclear weapons, peaceful use and military use cannot be distinguished.

The nuclear power management system should be part of an advanced military management system.

Nevertheless, Japan is in a state where the nuclear weapons retention = nuclear control system is unreasonably cast by the victorious nations under the NPT Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Treaty and the Japan-US Security Treaty.

In fact, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is a French-made nuclear power plant 40 years ago, and it is virtually impossible for Japan to create or manage its own nuclear power plant, and it is necessary to clearly know the fact that it is not allowed.

In such a situation, the bokeh peace theorists who ridicule the use of "peace" as "safety" should understand again that they have not been able to deal with the destruction and occupation of nuclear power plants by North Korea.

The next problem is that energy self-sufficiency is indispensable for the construction of Japan, a powerful country, and the dependence on foreign countries for plutonium and other materials necessary for nuclear power plants is no different from oil.

Originally, holding a nuclear weapon monopolized by the victorious nation cannot overtake the United States and Russia after all.
Japan, which aims to overthrow the white empire, should develop new weapons that surpass even nuclear weapons and retain the power to make nuclear weapons useless.

It is a fact of history that winning a war lies in the evolution of military tactics and the ability to develop weapons.
Development of weapons that use air, water, or seawater as an energy source It is self-evident that military development can be passed on to normal use, and we should focus on it with all our knowledge.
If this leads to the peaceful use of humankind, the modern war, which was a villainous energy struggle, will end.
However, we have no intention of facing a good person who opposes or advocates the elimination of nuclear power simply because the nuclear power plant is dangerous.

I am convinced that we must crush the "external dependence" and "global led by victorious countries" that are hindering Japan's independence and the construction of a powerful nation.

Even if we destroy the existing nuclear power plants, it is not necessary for Japan to close its eyes, and we believe that the maximum development and research on the state-of-the-art nuclear weapons is naturally indispensable.
Therefore, if the struggle to overthrow white imperialism with existing nuclear weapons is more necessary than the development of new weapons, we must be prepared to establish a war situation by retaining nuclear weapons in a short period of time. In that case, it is natural that nuclear control (including nuclear power plants, if any) will be tightened, and it should not be set up in coastal areas or residential areas that are most attacked by the enemy, underground, in the mountains, etc. It is natural to isolate (make it a secret base).

From the ideological system, we believe that human beings who should submit before nature should not forgive the violence that destroys nature in accordance with Shinto in Japan.
In order to realize this world, we must defeat the white imperialists who have been overrunning the world for 200 years, advocating human-first humanism.

It is a strong conviction that only Japan, a hero of color, can exist.

Finally, limiting the issue of nuclear power to a mere promotion / abolition debate on the grounds that it is "dangerous" does not change the actual state of self-destruction in Japan.

I would like to add that.
November 1, 2011