August 1, 2015

Editor The public is making noise about the so-called "security bill" of the Abe Cabinet.

The content of the chairman is a very childish parliamentary controversy.

Is this the "representative chosen by the people", such as the familiarity of the ruling and opposition parties, the battle to draw out the enemy, and the foolishness of the end of the branch?

There is no spirit or determination as an independent sovereign state.

Without seeing the nation's masterpiece backed by history, tradition, and culture, both the ruling and opposition parties simply misunderstood the current colonial state of the United States as the highest peace "rooted in liberal democracy" and maintained it stubbornly. It is revealed that the issue is placed in the persistence.

In the first place, postwar Japan, which has overtaken the "given peace" and made it a gold medal, has made all the work to modify it a "punishment".

It is proof that the postwar Ese Peace taboo has penetrated to the end horribly.

The series of bills on the so-called conservative side, such as the Abe Cabinet, is nothing more than a pitiful sighing move to sneak up on the suzerain, the United States, rather than escape from the current state of defeated nations.

In this sense, our alliance opposes the Abe Cabinet's "security bill."

The left wing and the Ese citizens who are crazy about anti-Japanese tactics are screaming as "Kujo guard dogs".

In fact, he said that it was unsightly to make no contribution to peace, and he just asked the alibi to "we have kept Article 9 of the Constitution."

Both the ruling and opposition parties have been in a state of non-thinking for seventy years, in which the "peace" spellcasters who regarded themselves as shamans and magicians struggled with their own faces.

There is an illusion that "doing nothing" is just peaceful, accustomed to "easy" peace.

"Doing nothing" means "not seeing, not hearing, not speaking" all the buds that lead to danger, and as long as you "beat the drum and make Article 9 of the Constitution the flag", both bullets and land mines on the battlefield There is nothing but occult thinking that they will avoid it.

National defense is one of the masterpieces of the existence of a self-reliant sovereign state. I have no choice but to question whether Japan has the spirit and determination for "independence," "independence," and "sovereignty." Just as there is neither "self-defense" nor "aggression" in war, the word "collective self-defense" itself is no longer a barren debate.

In the first place, under the Japan-US Security Treaty (U.S. forces stationed in Japan, budget, base provision, etc.), U.S. military aircraft and U.S. ships from Japan set sail on the battlefield in a dignified manner, returned to port and repaired rest, etc. Isn't it!

Abolishing this one-sided US-Japan Security Treaty and expanding its own defense capabilities should be a natural idea for a truly independent nation, regardless of whether it is a ruling or opposition party or conservative innovation.

In order to maintain and grow the security of the national people, it is not limited to national defense that all kinds of options must be created and prepared.

Rather than discussing on the premise of war and quarrel, in order to protect the national people, not only do we take international public opinion, diplomacy, funds, and economic means, but we also have a strong "preparation and will" to defend even alone. I can't wait to say that the determination to "bleed" is essential.

Editor Recently, youths have been seen surrounding the Diet.

Chairperson When it comes to demonstrations and gatherings, there used to be a dangerous image and the behavior was limited to certain people, but nowadays it feels a bit strange to be able to participate in a "easy" festive mood.

It is necessary to understand that "activities" such as demonstrations are positioned at the opposite end of "discussion", and in fact, "denial of parliamentary democracy" is inherent.

If college students and high school students are rough-cut but use their bodies with pure feelings, their courage is truly impressive, but considering the content, in order to overthrow the established values, I have no choice but to wonder if there is a "pure determination" to offer even my own life, who will not refuse to be arrested.

If you look at the foolishness of accepting the leaders of opposition parties such as the Democratic Party, the Communist Party, and the Social Democratic Party, you can see what they really are.

Editor It's a figure that is manipulated by the Communist Party and the left wing.

Chairman Originally, if the "security bill" was discussed by the elected members of the Diet and passed, it should be the joint responsibility of the ruling and opposition parties, no matter how many opponents there are.

No matter how much you defend yourself, such as "I objected, but the number of members is small ...", in the case of parliamentary democracy that complies with the "democracy rules," both pros and cons cannot escape joint responsibility.

In other words, as long as it is a resolution of the parliament, the avoidance of liability is absolutely unacceptable.

If you're whining, you should reflect on your efforts to expand your party before lamenting your lack of numbers, and regret the lack of motivation to "surrender" just because you're inferior in number. Should be.

And it means that the organization that manages the demonstration should have the spirit to deny all the members of the Abe administration and the ruling and opposition parties, and the election and parliamentary system itself, instead of making such a pathetic opposition a "friend". I am keenly aware that there is no such thing.

If you want to deny the "finished race" of the Diet and try to overturn it, you must have the courage and determination to deny the Diet, the parliamentary party politics, and so on.

It can be easily judged that true liberal democracy is not an irresponsible majority vote, but that it is built by a responsible minority, considering the contents of the restoration transformation of the east and west, which was greeted by the cheers of thunder. ..

Editor Is it right to expect a struggle on the street?

Chairman This time, demonstrations surrounding the Diet are conspicuous, but on the contrary, there are also forces that oppose it.

I am convinced that the current "fluffy" flow is creating a path for the world-viewing political party to rise proudly from the current "fluffy" flow, which is the cutting-edge force of the youth of the melancholy who bet "with discipline and determination".

In our alliance, the restoration transformation has traditionally been triggered from the streets, denying parliamentary democracy to become an aristocratic salon, and crushing the "ballot box" system.

Existing denial = It is a natural reason not to quit illegality.

"Peace" always emerges from bloodshed and must be said to be precious because of the great sacrifice.

It must be understood that the bottom of the abyss is inevitable before trying to obtain self-satisfaction with this application, by simply adhering to the "common sense" created by others.

Editor Thank you very much for your meaningful story.