March 1, 2016

Is the editorial alliance said to have a reputation for radical behavior?

The current society that considers postponement and ambiguity to be "smooth" for the chairman's problem.

In a timid society where you can't scold face-to-face on the spot and look around and entrust your judgment to a third party, I really say and act that judgment, execution, and responsibility should be on my own. We all know that we can be seen as a "hair drama."

Therefore, at present, such a label from society is expected for me, and I feel that it is a medal.

 

Commissioner:

That is natural.

Because I'm not going to surprise the world with any special or bizarre claims, I'm just making the right thing.

Editor What kind of society does the "natural society" mentioned here mean?

Chairperson It is a society that thoroughly implements basic actions.

In other words, "let's do what everyone can do, let everyone do it."

One of the best is greetings.

"Good morning"

"goodbye"

Is a common behavior that everyone enforces in the morning and evening.

It is exactly the first place in 1-chome for building relationships. This has nothing to do with ideology, creed, origin, race, gender, gender, or location.

It must be said that it is a complete fall to mourn such as "human relations do not go well" without making various reasons for such basic movements.

In any era, environment, or country, if "I can't live alone without the cooperation of others," "I love myself and at the same time I love others."

And the premise of love, "I can be aware of myself and understand others on the extension line."

To that end, "see, think, judge, and act for yourself.

And we must create a society that fosters independence, such as "taking responsibility for it."

 

​

 

The premise of national independence is that the awareness and independence of the people who make up it are indispensable above all.

However, in postwar Japan, this natural independence and major obstacles to the construction of an independent nation have covered Japan.

I'm just trying to get rid of this dark cloud.

 

Editor :

This dark cloud is "postwar democracy."

 

Commissioner:

In postwar Japan, every attempt to exercise one's thoughts and independence is subject to a kind of censorship of "peace, freedom, democracy, and human rights."

No matter what you say or do, it is only recognized through this filter, and anything that cannot pass through it will be wiped out by all kinds of "witch hunts" as "social waste" and "anti-social" foreign bodies. is.

Although we say "freedom", only freedom that conforms to postwar values ​​is allowed, and freedom that corrects and denies postwar values ​​is a society that is not allowed to exist publicly.

What is even more surprising is that, first of all, the definition of the slogans "freedom," "democracy," and "peace" is very vague, despite the struggle of the big names. ..

Therefore, in the end, no one believes in this unclear "slogan", which is a different dream content on the same floor.

Secondly, and more importantly, there is the horrifying fact that everyone is unaware of the "freedom, democracy, and peace" that they "should believe".

Due to the defeat of Daitoa, there are cowards, cowards, and irresponsible people who misunderstand the orders given by the winners and say that it is the duty of the losers to obey them unconditionally.

The phenomenon seen when talking about "freedom, democracy, and peace" can be easily understood from the appearance of "freedom, democracy, and peace!"

For example, one's freedom shouts loudly, but the tendency to be indifferent to the freedom of others is evidence that he is not trying to understand the essence of "freedom" at all.

For the sake of safety that sparks do not fall on oneself, is it really "peace" to cover the cheeks of others' annoying screams?

 

Editor:

Recently, this trend can be seen especially in the context of the security law.

 

Commissioner:

"Against the war!" "Keep the constitution!"

Even if the freedom to insist is good, I have to say that there is no thought about maintaining "peace" beyond that.

On the side of screaming "against war", only the self-righteousness of "one-country pacifism" can be seen, and if you disagree with it, the United States, Russia, which is actually at war, and China, North Korea, who is crazy about arms race On the other hand, let's make a strong protest.

In other words, there is a difference in the perspective of grasping the current situation.

Those who recognize the current situation as "peace" because the bullets do not fly are in a position to close their eyes while having anxiety about future changes in the world, and to find the figure of peace in this status quo. ..

On the other hand, I recognize that the current situation, including myself, is an unstable and absurd state that does not deserve peace, and that is why I am in a position to stand up for true peace.

The purpose of the war is to give in and control the opponent, and I believe that the position of our country after the war is in the occupied state, which is still dominated by the victorious nation.

The power, motivation, and law to protect one's own country have been tampered with and castrated, and the spirit of independence and independence has declined in the constitution, justice, economy, politics, and culture. It is truly a gloomy country.

If you want to build and maintain peace, what on earth are you contributing?

Are you trying?

Are you thinking of true peace that you sometimes have to protect at the expense of your own life?

Must be explored.

Our alliance recognizes that Zhang himself, who caused the conflict in the modern world, is the Western white imperialism that has invaded Asia and Africa, and must find true peace in the current world order that is an extension of this. It is something to do.

"Modern Peace for Whites at the Sacrifice of Colored Races"

Is

"Postwar peace at the expense of Japan and Germany"

It is true peace to crush the absurdity of the world as soon as possible and to build a new world order of coexistence and co-prosperity of colored whites.

In order to obtain this peace and freedom, it is necessary to clearly understand that it is the providence of ancient, modern, eastern and western history that must be overthrown by the "principle of power".

 

Editor

Thank you very much for your valuable story.