top of page

Challenge to parliamentary democracy

Our alliance captures the overthrow of postwar values.

In other words, it is a break from the current postwar "conservatism / innovation" alternative of liberal democracy and communist socialism.

In Japan, which is still poisoned by the postwar US-Soviet Cold War structure, we cannot get out of the confrontational structure of "conservatism and innovation", and in the end, both of them "maintain the survival of our country" by obedience to their respective "sovereign countries = foreign powers". It is nothing but a seller.

All established political parties, from the Liberal Democratic Party to the Communist Party, are the puppets of the foreign powers that dominate the world today.

In other words, both are none other than followers of the defeated nation = postwar regime.

The second is the challenge of parliamentary democracy. It challenges the modern civilization that the Western powers continue to rule, and challenges the modern parliament and the modern constitution as a new civilization struggle to replace it.

The "democracy" that is prevalent today is nothing but a synonym for the poisonous fangs of white people who have overrun the world with modern weapons and Christianity.

He condemned him as a "barbaric" who scorned his original beliefs and lifestyles from ancient times, and forcibly pushed the political economy and culture rails, which are easily controlled by the suzerain, with genocide.

From the perspective of Japanese nationalism, it is understandable to see Islamic fundamentalism, Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and other parts of the world overcoming the current borders and violently fighting back against "Western, modern, and Christianity."


Therefore, first of all, in order to realize true democracy based on the idea of our national community, we must urgently realize the correction of the representative system = indirect democracy.

The bottom line is that true democracy lies directly in democracy, and the important issues of national nations must be settled by referendum.

The purpose of the current indirect representative, who is a professional closed-room circle, is merely a party interest party abbreviation and a collusion by the Election Mutual Aid Society.

Not only is such a verbal vote irresponsible, but it also facilitates the selling of the country by surrendering to a foreign country in order to maintain a safe status quo.

To that end, Parliament must no longer be an advisory body of professional representatives.

bottom of page