1. I would like to say that 70 years after the war, what was falsified even on National Foundation Day.

The corruption turmoil, in which the cunning trap that divides the post-war period and the pre-war period has been consistently promoted, is now lying.

And it is no exaggeration to say that the cause of all absurdities in Japan today is the distortion and falsification of "National Foundation Day" itself.

Of course, Japan's National Foundation Day is the day when Emperor Jimmu was enthroned.

However, nowadays, the history of defeat with "End of War Memorial Day" on August 15 as the "era", that is, the founding of the country itself was virtually rewritten as "August 15, 1945", and the unbelievable violence shook the major. We are walking around our country.

Not only does it make the era and the founding idea specified in the Japanese Shoki a mere ghost, but it also completely denies the history of the Eternal Emperor 2600 before the defeat of the Greater East Asia War. Unconditional replacement follow-up to victorious country (especially US) values is being carried out. The postwar philosophy is "permanent apology and masochism."

And all the standards of Japan's "history, tradition, and culture" were conveniently rewritten as victorious countries after the war.

For example, it is clear that even a single word such as "maintenance / innovation" cannot be regarded as the same standard as before the war.

The arrogant and irreverent assault that denied and divided the glorious imperial history of Japan and repainted it as if it was a losing dog from the beginning continued for 70 years.

Indeed, there is the abomination of the homeland that drifts like a wandering old man who has forgotten even his past.

In this state, there can be no pride in the past, no romance in the future, and no will, so even the sense of making judgments, decisions, and responsibilities is castrated.
An abomination that clings to the mysterious rail of "securing the peace and security of one's own country" for 70 years, clinging to "the justice and justice of peace-loving nations."

We must violently warn of the horrifying situation in which the "signpost to despair" suitable for the people who have lost their fangs and turned into livestock has been steadily leading our country to slaughter for 70 years.

2. Postwar parliament that is meaningful not to make a decision There is a "decision" that I have repeatedly mentioned in the bulletin. It is a historical theorem that undecidable politics is corruption and is the main cause of inviting domestic and foreign war damage.

This has appeared many times in the history of east and west, and has destroyed the national people.
The reasons for this are firstly the qualities of the leader and secondly the structure of the system itself.

About the former leader. It goes without saying that leaders are required to make instant judgments and decisions on the spot.

And once you make a decision, it is quite natural to take responsibility until the end.

Therefore, the decision-maker must always prepare for every situation and be prepared.

A delicate attention and attention that seems to be timid from the side, and a determination power that boiled by the determination of immortality. This is a typical example of a qualification to be a leader.

I also encounter scenes that are betrayed by the results.

However, if you have speed, you can make a reversal offensive with a margin for correction.

Of course, flying with a purposeless bounce is out of the question.

However, it should be argued here that the decision-maker is the only person and it is never possible to line up more than one.

It is self-evident that such a dynamic heroic leader did not exist in the timid Potsdam Parliamentary House, which became a puppet of foreign powers after the war.
Next, about the political system.

If you can't make a decision in the first place, there is a stagnation in the system itself that does not allow you to make a decision.

It is said that "democracy" is "decided" by the debate and majority vote of many representatives, but the work of exploring a compromise called debate takes action and eliminates some who still resist. "Ceremony" will be adopted by majority.

However, the reality is that behind-the-scenes cunning ground fighting and behind-the-scenes transactions are rampant, and the person who manages this becomes a faction boss.

In political terms, a distorted system in which "democracy is not the best, but it is better" or "politics is a compromise" is a common sense, and it must be said that it is a terminal symptomatology.

The point is, no matter how much the current parliamentary democracy system is modified, if the foundations are off, decision politics cannot rise even if it takes hundreds or thousands of years.

It should be strongly recognized that there can be no sound national reconstruction other than overthrowing the reality of "parliamentary democracy," which is based on "maintaining the status quo" and "inaction."

3. Dictatorship is the ultimate form of democracy When I say this, for example, I bring up "fascist dictatorship" and make a noise such as "protect democracy", but this is 10 million laughter.

Democracy and dictatorship are actually on the same ground, without having to unravel the history of the east and west, and they are substitutes for mutual development of their forms as needed.

However, what should not be mistaken is that there is an image of "democracy" = majority vote, "dictatorship" = independent decision, but even if it is a majority vote, that decision = responsibility must be independent, as mentioned above. is.

Therefore, there is naturally a single chief executive officer in the democratic system.

Is this called "dictatorship"?

The problem here is how to make a "chat circle" that you don't want to take responsibility for "decision".

In Japan's parliamentary democracy, "parliament" means indirect democracy to embody the will of the people by voting, and it was limited because debate and debate could not be established with an unspecified and irresponsible majority. It's just a "representative" by a responsible representative.

The fact that the parliamentary house, who misunderstood this as the will of the people, freely debates and legislates with the parliamentary badge as a shield by the party interests and private interests is far from the original democracy.

This is because parliamentary democracy operates with its ultimate responsibility obscured compared to other political systems.
The factors behind Japan's "decision" after the war are the combination of the above two factors.

If the top is the top, the same is true for the bottom.

How can each and every one of us have confidence and magnificent romance for those who have become accustomed to giving up because their raison d'etre and origin are despised?

Furthermore, as long as we run on the rails of the system that has become "postwar common sense" by the victorious nations that are trying to continue to occupy our country, it is absolutely impossible to get out of the current colonial state.
Therefore, to overthrow the undecidable irresponsible politics, we must overthrow all the systems that have denied and concealed the past male figure of the nation.

Returning the postwar common sense such as "separation of powers" and "international cooperation" to a blank slate, the superiority of the administration over legislation and judiciary, the conversion of the parliament into an advisory body, and the reorganization into a parliament by function.

And most importantly, the appearance of a heroic leader is essential.

History eloquently tells us that the heroes who descend in turbulent times are always winners from street turmoil and bloody struggles, not from ballot boxes, and are mavericks under the established regime.